The iPhone 14 may look similar to its predecessor, the iPhone 13, but under the hood, Apple has made significant changes. Last week, I explored the iPhone 14 Pro and discovered its resistance to third-party repairs. This week, I decided to tear down the standard iPhone 14 to assess its repairability and understand the new design changes Apple has introduced. This teardown not only reveals the intricacies of Apple’s latest hardware but also highlights the ongoing challenges faced by those attempting third-party repairs on Apple devices.
I began by unboxing two international models of the iPhone 14 in vibrant purple and red. Both came without a charger or headphones, a trend Apple has maintained to reduce electronic waste, but they did include a SIM reader—something the U.S. models notably lack. This inclusion reflects the variations in hardware based on regional market needs. After setting up the phones and ensuring they were functioning correctly, I heated one of them on a heat plate for five minutes to soften the adhesive before removing the pentalobe security screws and prying off the display.
Opening the phone revealed an unexpected sight. Unlike previous models, the iPhone 14’s internals were covered by a large section of aluminum, hiding most of the components. This shielding is likely intended to protect delicate components and enhance the phone’s durability, but it also adds a layer of complexity for anyone attempting repairs. To get a closer look, I removed the display entirely, which was simpler than on previous iPhones, requiring only two screws and brackets. This simplicity is a welcome change for those familiar with the often cumbersome process of removing iPhone displays.
Next, I turned my attention to the back glass, which in earlier models required a laser to remove—a process fraught with difficulty and risk. This time, after heating the back glass, it came off easily, revealing a modular and removable design. This was a significant improvement over the iPhone 14 Pro and earlier models, making the back glass easier to replace. The modularity of the back glass is a step in the right direction for repairability, as it reduces the likelihood of damaging other components during the removal process.
With the back glass off, I could see a layout that was both familiar and different. The rear camera was now positioned to face us from the other side, reminiscent of the design seen in the first-generation iPhone 4 and 4S. This design choice, while nostalgic, also serves a functional purpose, likely aiding in the alignment of internal components. However, despite the apparent modularity, I wanted to test if the rumored software pairing of the back glass to the device was true. To do this, I needed to swap the logic boards between the two phones.
Removing the logic board was trickier than expected. One screw was hidden beneath the earpiece, requiring me to disassemble additional components. The camera cable was held down with adhesive, which, once freed, allowed me to remove the dual cameras and finally extract the logic board. The process was meticulous, demanding patience and precision—qualities essential for anyone attempting to repair or modify modern smartphones.
Interestingly, the iPhone 14 uses the A15 Bionic processor from the previous year’s model, the iPhone 13, but its internal design has undergone significant changes. The logic board now features connections on the back, designed for easier display removal. This alteration simplifies the process of screen replacement but also introduces new challenges, particularly when it comes to reassembling the device.
I performed the logic board swap between the two phones, taking care to install the display before reconnecting the battery to avoid any potential risks. Upon booting, both phones displayed error messages indicating that some parts might not be genuine. These messages were similar to those I encountered with the iPhone 14 Pro, which disabled functionalities like True Tone, auto-brightness, battery health, and Face ID when certain parts were replaced. These software restrictions are part of Apple’s broader strategy to maintain control over repairs, effectively penalizing third-party or DIY repairs.
To test the rumor about the back glass being software-linked to each phone, I found that wireless charging and the flash worked fine without triggering any anti-third-party repair messages. This was a relief, as it indicated that at least some components could be replaced without software penalties. However, replacing the front cameras resulted in errors similar to those on the iPhone 14 Pro. Interestingly, reinstalling iOS 16.0 fixed the front camera issue, but portrait mode and cinematic mode remained non-functional. This suggests that while some issues can be resolved through software, others remain persistently tied to Apple’s repair restrictions.
Despite these software hurdles, the iPhone 14’s design made it more modular than its predecessors. Components like the back glass and display are easier to remove and replace, which theoretically enhances repairability. However, this modularity did not translate into actual repairability, as Apple’s software still penalizes third-party repairs. For example, replacing the display disables True Tone and auto-brightness, a new battery disables battery health, and a new front camera breaks Face ID, portrait mode, and cinematic mode. Additionally, replacing the logic board triggers all these penalties, making it clear that Apple’s software is designed to discourage unauthorized repairs.
In terms of repairability, iFixit rated the iPhone 14 a 7 out of 10, praising its modular design. However, I disagree with this assessment. While it’s the most modular iPhone to date, the software restrictions make it less repairable in practice. Comparatively, Samsung phones, which iFixit rates lower, are easier to work on and don’t suffer from the same software issues. This discrepancy highlights the ongoing debate over what truly constitutes “repairability” in modern smartphones—hardware accessibility or software freedom.
Finally, I reassembled both phones, using modified adhesive strips to secure the battery and reattaching all components. Despite the modular design, the software penalties remain a significant barrier to third-party repairs, emphasizing the need for the Right to Repair. This journey through the iPhone 14 teardown highlights Apple’s continued efforts to control repairs and maintain their ecosystem, impacting consumers’ choices and repair options. As consumers, we must be aware of these challenges and advocate for more accessible repair options, not just for iPhones but for all electronic devices.
The iPhone 14 is a testament to Apple’s engineering prowess, combining modularity with a sleek design. However, this modularity is undermined by software that penalizes those who dare to repair their devices outside of Apple’s authorized network. As the Right to Repair movement gains momentum, the conversation around repairability will continue to evolve, pushing manufacturers like Apple to reconsider their approach.
In conclusion, while the iPhone 14 represents a step forward in terms of hardware design, it falls short in terms of true repairability. The device may be easier to disassemble and reassemble, but the software restrictions imposed by Apple negate much of the progress made. As consumers, we should demand better—devices that are not only beautifully designed but also fully repairable, without fear of software penalties. For those interested in the future of repairability and technology, this teardown serves as both a cautionary tale and a call to action.
Shop no. 20 A kensington village shopping center, 8 sovereigns ave,Bray Park QLD 4500
gadget.kings.prs@gmail.com